Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Parents Role in Social Media



Parents Role in Social Media
Social media sites have become huge libraries of digital profiles and young children, even teenagers are often oblivious to the consequences of sharing their lives online. When creating a Facebook page you are asked for your birthday to verify your age.  Facebook has a policy that no one under that age of 13 is allowed to open a page without verifiable consent from a parent.  But many children lie to and open a page anyway.  Some parents are even helping their children lie.  Children under the age of 13 should not be allowed to open a social networking page.  There are too many risks involved.
Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (COPPA) states that “if a website plans to gather information from a child under the age of 13, they must secure verifiable consent from a parent and publicly state how the information will be collected, used and disclosed somewhere on the website.”  Protected information includes their name, address, email address, telephone number and their social security number.  Adults openly put our personal information on the internet for anyone to see, presumably opening the door for online predators to know who we are, where we are and what we are doing, why would we want young children to do so?
Ask yourself this question. If my 8 to 12 year old child came up to me and asked if they could get a Facebook page would you allow them to create a page? Let’s take a different approach; What if your child said, “Mom can I open an internet page that will open the opportunity for my personal information to be obtained by anyone, where I can post what I am doing, where I’m located, and maybe even open the door for online predators?”  Would your answer be the same?  Children don’t think of these kinds of consequences.  They are thinking of how cool it is to have a Facebook page.  We as parent need to help them to understand the possible consequences. 

Consumer Reports reported last year (2011) that more than 7.5 million American kids under the age of 13 had joined Facebook.  Which more than 5 million were 10 or under. (Consumer report June 2011)  What I find even more frightening is that many of these children’s parents are helping them get a Facebook profile.  Why would parents openly put children at risk?  I have heard a few different excuses. Such as “I would rather help them get on line then to do it behind my back.”  Being active in your children’s daily lives will decrease their feeling of the need to go behind your back.  Another argument is that some kids mature faster than others, i.e. a parent should decide if their kids are old enough to expose themselves to social media.    I can understand that parents feel that they have a better understanding of their children.  However we need to fulfill our main obligation to protect our children and not put them in harm’s way.  By helping them create a Facebook profile we are teaching them that it’s ok to break federal governments regulations put in place to protect minors.  We teach them to lie and that it’s ok because we said it was.  As stated before (COPPA) states that “verifiable consent must be obtained.”  I presume that if parents are helping their children lie and create a Facebook page then that is their parents form on consent.  However it would be unverifiable, not verifiable.

 How does Facebook get verifiable consent?  While searching multiple search engines for some time, I was only able to find one article about how Facebook could create a way.  Tony Bradley from pcworld states that “All Facebook has to do is add a step that sends a consent verification e-mail to a parent or guardian when someone under 13 sets up an account.”(web)  Sounds simple, but what is to stop a child from sending this email on their own or create a make believe account.  Stating you are someone else is as simple as typing a different name to create an email address.  In order to prove my point I opened an account with a different name.  No one asked me to verify that I was Sharpie Marker.   So I created sharpie_marker@ymail.com and it worked out great.  Getting verifiable consent is tougher than it sounds.  Keeping underage Facebook users off Facebook is the only real way to keep their private information safe.
We live in a digital world that children need to learn about.  However, I agree with Dr. Gwenn O’Keeffe that Facebook is a poor choice for young children to learn about the internet: "The lessons of digital citizenship have to start young, but I don't feel that Facebook is the venue to have those lessons occurs.  A lot of missteps happen on that site without a lot of coaching."(web)  I agree that it is good for children to learn about the internet, but the point that needs emphasized is that there are better internet sites out there to help them learn.  As an example my 3-year old daughter loves to play on nickjr.com. She gets to learn how to use the computer and internet without exposing her personal information.  At the same time she is also learning how to spell and count.  There are a multitude of social media sites that children can join that are, arguably, safer; i.e. Club Penguin, Kidzworld, Webkinz and Imbee are just a few.  These social sites are presumed to be safer; however parents still need to be observing their children while on these sites.  Sheri Bauman, Ph.D.  An associate professor at University of Arizona, Tucson states; “When young children interact on Web sites with social components, the adults are less likely to be observing each interaction…opposed to face-to-face interactions.”(3)  Sheri’s statement goes back to what I had stated previously about parents being a part of their children’s everyday lives.  Though I concede that children need to develop internet skills starting at a young age, I still insist that Facebook is far too dangerous of a site to build computer and internet skills.
Children need to develop other skills such as reading a book, writing on paper, handwriting skills, and spelling without spell check.  Exposing children to LOL and OMG may not allow them do develop the necessary skills they should be using in everyday life.  Not to mention face to face social skills.  Neuroscientist D. Derbyshire observed; “that while technology and computers have positive contributions, children should have ample experience with in-person relationships before they start using social networking sites” (2) A Good example of Derbyshire’s observations is my little Brother who has grown up never knowing what it is like not to have a computer.  Although he has a great education on how to run computers and the technology behind it, he unfortunately has become socially awkward when it comes to face-to-face contact, even with family.  “Face-to-face interactions are the most emotionally maturing experiences” (Cordes & Miller, 2000) When we talk online he can talk for hours. When off Facebook and into the public he becomes quiet, not sure how to start a conversation.  My brother has had troubles finding a job because when needing to have the conversation skills needed in many jobs out there he has fallen short.  Children that grow up using social media sites may not learn the social skills needed to develop as working adults. 
Children under the age of 13 should not be allowed to join Facebook.  The dangers of not only potential predators’ but the lack of developmental and face-to-face social skills can be detrimental.  As parents we need to help our children understand the consequences of their actions online.  Parents have that obligation to teach their children those values.  Parents are the key roles in a child’s development.  Insure that they get the right direction.

                                                         Works Cited

Bauman, Sheri and Tanisha Tatum. "Web Sites for Young Children: Gateway to Online Social Networking?" Professional School Counseling; Vol. 13 Issue 1, October 2009: 1-7.
Bradley, Tony. http://www.pcworld.com. 21 May 2011. 21 June 2012.
Consumer Reports. "consumer Reports." That Facebook friend might be 10 years old, and other troubling news June 2011: unknown.
Daw, David. http://www.pcworld.com. 23 May 2011. 1 June 2012.
Derbyshire, David. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1153583/Social-websites-harm-childrens-brains-Chilling-warning-parents-neuroscientist.html. 23 Febuary 2009. 20 June 2012.
McHugh, Kenna. http://socialtimes.com. 16 March 2011. 21 June 2012.






No comments:

Post a Comment